Buddhist Logic as a Discipline of Epistemic Restraint: From Perception to the Limits of Inference
What does it mean to know something—and when are we justified in making a claim about the world? This essay explores Buddhist logic not merely as a system of reasoning, but as a discipline that reveals the conditions and limits of knowledge itself. From non-conceptual perception to judgment and inference, it shows how each step in cognition introduces both clarity and the risk of error. By examining how concepts shape experience, how inference depends on relational structures, and how absence can mislead understanding, the study repositions logic as a practice of restraint rather than assertion. Ultimately, it argues that wisdom lies not in saying more about the world, but in knowing when a claim is justified—and when silence is the most precise response.









